Dodge’s mid-size Dakota pickup spent nearly 25 years on the market before its 2011 demise. Here, we dive into each of the model’s three generations to pick the best and worst years for the Dodge Dakota.
At Vehicle History, the aim is to provide comprehensive, well-researched, and most importantly, unbiased information for car buyers. But it’s hard to keep bias completely out of the picture when it comes to the Dodge Dakota. This is a good-looking truck, and it drives like a Dodge muscle car. It’s hard not to gush.
But, not all Dodge Dakotas were created equal, some of them have some serious problems, and some have stood the test of time better than others. So if you’re already set on buying a Dakota, and you’re just not sure which model year to go with, we’re here to tell you what you need to know to make an informed purchase.
First-generation Dodge Dakota: 1987-1996
The first-generation Dakotas (1987–1996) are probably the coolest in terms of styling. In fact, it’s safe to say that they stand among the coolest-looking pickups ever made.
The 1989-1991 Sport convertibles in particular were really unique, offering an alternative to the Wrangler for fans of topless adventure vehicles. The limited-edition Li’l Red Express, available with wooden bed rails, brings to mind those Radio Flyer wagons we grew up with.
First-generation Dakotas are a lot of fun to drive with their rugged leaf-spring rear-end suspension, and the 1992 Dakota with the 230 horsepower 5.2L Magnum V8 engine is an off-road beast. If you’re a collector, this is probably the one you want.
That is… if you’re a collector.
If you want a reliable mid-size pickup, you probably don’t want to bother with anything over 20 years old, especially considering that first-gen. Dakotas had a serious problem with early transmission failure in the automatic models, which you’ll find mentioned all over online forums like DodgeDakota.net and Reddit.
Meaning that if you somehow manage to find one with under 100k miles on it, there’s still a good chance the thing will start shaking and rattling on you before long, and now you’ve got to find someone who can sell you a transmission for a 30-year-old pickup.
You’ll have fewer issues with a manual transmission than with an automatic, but even so, the maintenance on a truck that’s almost old enough to have grandkids makes it a less-than-ideal choice, so as cool as these first-gen Dakotas are, we can’t name any of them as the best on the market today.
Second-generation Dodge Dakota: 1997-2004
The second-generation Dakota was modeled after the Ram, which was intended to look more like a semi-truck than a farm pickup. The bulkier styling we saw in this era of pickups helped to define the look that’s still with us today in Rams, Silverados, and F-150s.
Second-generation powertrain options offered a whole spectrum of oomph, with a 2.5L straight-four being the weakest available engine, a 5.9L Magnum V8 being the strongest, and some solid 3.7L and 3.9L Magnum V6s right in the middle.
The second generation is where you’re going to start finding plenty of Dakotas in decent shape without too many miles on the odometer. Unfortunately, it’s also where you’re going to find some of the least reliable models Dodge ever cranked out.
In particular, the 1999-2003 automatics are notoriously flakey, owing to the Dodge 45RFE transmission. These transmissions were known to buckle under too much power, and that’s a serious problem when you’re driving a mid-size pickup with a V8 under the hood.
Take a look at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) page for the 2003 model alone, and you’ll find dozens of complaints relating to the powertrain and vehicle speed control.
The second generation also performed poorly in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s (IIHS) crash tests.
Third-generation Dodge Dakota: 2005-2011
The third generation offered only one option for manual transmission, a six-speed Getrag 238, and two options engine options, a 3.7L Magnum V6 cranking out 210 horsepower, and a 4.7L Magnum V8 cranking out 260.
By 2007, Dodge had removed the manual transmission option from the V8s. And guess what, the automatic transmissions in this generation are pretty lousy, too. For generation three, we’re talking about the notorious Ultradrive transmission that powered everything from Wranglers to Durangos for a three-decade reign.
The Ultradrive offered smooth, easy shifting, and it felt great to drive, but Dodge got a little too eager to rush it into production, and the consumer paid the price.
The issues with the Ultradrive date back to when the transmission was brand-new, over thirty years ago, but Dodge never quite got it figured out, finally retiring the transmission in 2019.
You should be seeing the pattern by now: if you’re driving a manual transmission, any given Dakota is about as reliable as its previous owner was.
With proper maintenance, there’s no reason a manual-transmission 1992, 2001, or 2005 Dakota can’t last for decades to come. But in an automatic, you’re always going to be feeling like you’re driving on borrowed time.
These are trucks for people who really like the feel of that clutch-and-shifter action. If you’ve gotta have an automatic, then you might want to consider a Ranger or a Tacoma.
The third-generation Dakota performed better than the second with the IIHS, but only moderately, scoring an overall evaluation of A for Average.
To take a look at the sales figures for the Dodge Dakota, you can see that the truck went out not with a bang, but with a whimper.
The Dakota was regularly selling over 100,000 units a year in the U.S. from 1992 to 2005, then after they dropped the manual V8s, those numbers plummeted to around fifty thousand units in 2007, half that in 2008, and barely over ten thousand units a year from 2009 to 2011.
A disappointing finish for one of the coolest and most iconic trucks of the 90s and early-00s.
What’s the Best Year for a Dodge Dakota?
The 2004 Dodge Dakota is the best in terms of performance and reliability, but only if you’re driving a manual.
The second-generation Dakotas outclass the third, due in large part to the wider range of powertrain and transmission options, and the fact that 2007-2011 Dakotas do not offer a manual V8 option.
The first-generation Dakotas win on sheer cool factor, but we’ve got to take reliability into account, too, and you’re just not likely to find a 1989 Sport convertible in near-mint condition, and you’re not likely to find a Li’l Red Express for sale in any condition.
The 2004 Dakota currently holds an owner’s review rating of 4.2 stars out of a possible five on Vehicle History, with 43% of 70 reviews giving the truck a perfect five-star rating.
Owners like that it’s surprisingly fuel-efficient for its age (estimated around 14/19 mpg city/highway depending on equipment), and they love that their trucks are still humming along smoothly after 100k, 200k, even 300k miles, according to Vehicle History verified owner Albert M., who adds that it “runs like a deer.”
All of this being said, any model year Dakota in decent condition without too many miles on the odometer should be a fine purchase, just as long as you stay away from the automatics, especially the 2005-2011s with Ultradrive.
Photos: Stellantis